Search for Indicators
Health
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Kings
23.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Opioid Prescription Patients County: Kings
Opioid Prescription Patients County: Kings
2.6%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings
Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings
300.8
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Prior Value
(293.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily
Value
Compared to:
Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Kings
Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Kings
6.6
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Kings
18.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings
0.0*
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Kings
6.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Health / Mortality Data
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Kings
14.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
CA Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(15.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings
14.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 47 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Health / Mortality Data
Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Kings
15.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Kings
Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Kings
36.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Kings
Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Kings
16.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Life Expectancy County: Kings
Life Expectancy County: Kings
77.3
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(79.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Mortality Data
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings
34.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(9.9%)
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
Value
Compared to:
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Kings
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Kings
26.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Older Adults
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
Value
Compared to:
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Kings
Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Kings
32.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Kings
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Kings
41.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Kings
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Kings
16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Kings
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Kings
10.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Kings
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Kings
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Kings
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Kings
19.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kings
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kings
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings
Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings
37.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Alone County: Kings
People 65+ Living Alone County: Kings
21.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings
People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings
3,351
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
1,846
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Kings
Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Kings
12.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
55.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Children who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
Children who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
91.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
CA Value
(89.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(92.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Dentist Rate County: Kings
Dentist Rate County: Kings
63
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(93)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist County: Kings
Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist County: Kings
12.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Arthritis County: Kings
Adults with Arthritis County: Kings
19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults with Kidney Disease County: Kings
Adults with Kidney Disease County: Kings
3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Kings
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Kings
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Kings
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Kings
31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Kings
7.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Kings
48.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(43.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(46.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma County: Kings
Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma County: Kings
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults who Smoke County: Kings
Adults who Smoke County: Kings
12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
Value
Compared to:
Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days County: Kings
Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days County: Kings
7.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days County: Kings
Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days County: Kings
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Asthma County: Kings
Adults with Asthma County: Kings
16.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(20.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with COPD County: Kings
Adults with COPD County: Kings
6.1%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults with Current Asthma County: Kings
Adults with Current Asthma County: Kings
10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Proximity to Highways County: Kings
Proximity to Highways County: Kings
0.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Kings
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Kings
675.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(484.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(652.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
268.5
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(95.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection
Value
Compared to:
Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection County: Kings
Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection County: Kings
1.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Kings
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Kings
210.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(230.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(203.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Kings
HIV Diagnosis Rate County: Kings
7.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(6.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV/AIDS Prevalence Rate: 13+ County: Kings
HIV/AIDS Prevalence Rate: 13+ County: Kings
168.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
CA Value
(414.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(163.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Persons Living and Diagnosed with HIV who are in Care
Value
Compared to:
Persons Living and Diagnosed with HIV who are in Care County: Kings
Persons Living and Diagnosed with HIV who are in Care County: Kings
64.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
CA Value
(73.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(64.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Living with HIV Rate County: Kings
Persons Living with HIV Rate County: Kings
136.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(355.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(97.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
17.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
5th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
5th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
47.2%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(41.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(45.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
42.4%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(43.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Happy with Weight County: Kings
Adults Happy with Weight County: Kings
44.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Are Obese County: Kings
Adults Who Are Obese County: Kings
32.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
72.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(78.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children who are Overweight for Age County: Kings
Children who are Overweight for Age County: Kings
15.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
CA Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
Value
Compared to:
Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
80.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(85.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(81.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks
Value
Compared to:
Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks County: Kings
Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks County: Kings
63.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(73.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(68.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym County: Kings
Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym County: Kings
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages County: Kings
Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages County: Kings
23.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
CA Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control County: Kings
Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control County: Kings
27.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Kings
Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Kings
61.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home County: Kings
Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home County: Kings
72.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
Value
Compared to:
Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days County: Kings
Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days County: Kings
44.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(40.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle County: Kings
Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle County: Kings
31.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(31.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
Value
Compared to:
Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
96.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(93.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Frequent Physical Distress County: Kings
Frequent Physical Distress County: Kings
14.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Kings
Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Kings
13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
Value
Compared to:
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better County: Kings
83.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(82.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
Value
Compared to:
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Kings
Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Kings
21.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
