Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Mental Health

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Value
Compared to:

Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression County: Kings

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Kings has a value of 18.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services

Value
Compared to:

Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services County: Kings

51.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 51.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (55.9%), Kings has a value of 51.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (51.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.2%).
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression County: Kings

16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.7%), Kings has a value of 16.1%.
CA Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Kings has a value of 16.1%.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings

22.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 22.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (19.0%), Kings has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control County: Kings

27.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (26.6%), Kings has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Kings has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (27.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings

20.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings

14.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 47 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.5), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kings

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings

Current Value:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings

14.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

Value
Compared to:

Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services County: Kings

Current Value:

Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services County: Kings

9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Kings has a value of 9.7%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Kings has a value of 9.7%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Mental Health Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Mental Health Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Mental Health Provider Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Mental Health Provider Rate County: Kings

236
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 236 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 401 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 259.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 236 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (450), Kings has a value of 236 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(450)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (236) is greater and better than the previously measured value (224).
Prior Value
(224)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Kings

Current Value:

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Kings

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Kings has a value of 5.4%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Kings has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days County: Kings

Current Value:

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days County: Kings

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 17.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Kings has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings

34.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (9.9%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(9.9%)

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services County: Kings

70.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (70.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (55.2%).
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services County: Kings

79.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (79.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of 2-1-1 resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of 2-1-1 resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of 2-1-1 resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of 2-1-1 resources County: Kings

12.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources County: Kings

25.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (25.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of church or spiritual community resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of church or spiritual community resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of church or spiritual community resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of church or spiritual community resources County: Kings

41.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (41.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (35.6%).
Prior Value
(35.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of emergency room resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of emergency room resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of emergency room resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of emergency room resources County: Kings

28.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.6%).
Prior Value
(38.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Kings County Behavioral Health resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Kings County Behavioral Health resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of Kings County Behavioral Health resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of Kings County Behavioral Health resources County: Kings

43.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (43.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.6%).
Prior Value
(38.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Kings View resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Kings View resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of Kings View resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of Kings View resources County: Kings

33.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (33.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (36.6%).
Prior Value
(36.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of the suicide hotline resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of the suicide hotline resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of the suicide hotline resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of the suicide hotline resources County: Kings

42.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.4%).
Prior Value
(57.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of urgent care resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of urgent care resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of urgent care resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of urgent care resources County: Kings

35.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (35.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Warm Line resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are aware of Warm Line resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of Warm Line resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of Warm Line resources County: Kings

31.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (31.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings

20.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to an inability to find a provider County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to an inability to find a provider County: Kings

37.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (45.8%).
Prior Value
(45.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances County: Kings

34.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance County: Kings

21.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4%).
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation County: Kings

26.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (26.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to not being covered by insurance County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to not being covered by insurance County: Kings

10.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4%).
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours County: Kings

33.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (33.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma County: Kings

22.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents Who Have Experienced an Increase in Mental Health Symptoms in Past Two Years

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents Who Have Experienced an Increase in Mental Health Symptoms in Past Two Years

Value
Compared to:

Respondents Who Have Experienced an Increase in Mental Health Symptoms in Past Two Years County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents Who Have Experienced an Increase in Mental Health Symptoms in Past Two Years County: Kings

60.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (60.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (47.9%).
Prior Value
(47.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Respondents who have experienced increased mental health symptoms but do not know where to receive mental health care County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who have experienced increased mental health symptoms but do not know where to receive mental health care County: Kings

22.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.4%).
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who have experienced increased mental health symptoms but have not received mental health care County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who have experienced increased mental health symptoms but have not received mental health care County: Kings

40.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (40.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (61.4%).
Prior Value
(61.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who have increased mental health symptoms due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who have increased mental health symptoms due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who have increased mental health symptoms due to the COVID-19 pandemic County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who have increased mental health symptoms due to the COVID-19 pandemic County: Kings

57.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (57.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.2%).
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community County: Kings

30.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.