Search for Indicators
Got Needs? Kings County Community Survey
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings
Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings
19.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who need assistance with childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who need assistance with preschool
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings
10.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings
47.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who utilize center-based childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings
Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings
61.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Respondents who utilize home-based childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings
Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings
38.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Education / Literacy
Education / Literacy
Respondents who need assistance with English language classes
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings
9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Education / Literacy
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings
22.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Literacy
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings
22.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Literacy
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings
Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings
18.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings
Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings
44.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings
36.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings
Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings
42.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible County: Kings
87.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable County: Kings
79.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(61.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible County: Kings
86.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable County: Kings
86.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality County: Kings
68.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe County: Kings
Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe County: Kings
78.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(75.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area County: Kings
Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area County: Kings
65.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(60.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(66.5%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area County: Kings
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area County: Kings
47.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(22.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(50.4%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community County: Kings
58.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(35.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(57.9%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings
28.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings
20.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings
30.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings
35.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings
48.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(71.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings
57.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(81.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community County: Kings
Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community County: Kings
64.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(100.0%)
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings
23.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings
62.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(83.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings
42.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(59.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings
27.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings
39.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings
37.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings
17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings
28.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings
49.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
