Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Substance Use

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings

407.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 407.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Kings has a value of 407.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (407.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (425.4).
Prior Value
(425.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Kings

23.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Kings has a value of 23.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (23.0) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.7).
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Kings

11.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Kings has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0).
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Kings

18.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 18.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Kings has a value of 18.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.3).
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose County: Kings

9.3
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Kings has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

0.0*
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6.
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Kings has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Kings

11.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Kings has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.4).
Prior Value
(9.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone) County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone) County: Kings

9.8
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7), Kings has a value of 9.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.6).
Prior Value
(6.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div>IVP-22: Reduce overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone</div>

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Kings

15.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Kings has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Kings has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (15.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Kings

157.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 157.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Kings has a value of 157.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (157.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (152.6).
Prior Value
(152.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

13.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 13.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Kings has a value of 13.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (13.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8).
Prior Value
(6.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Kings

51.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 51.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Kings has a value of 51.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (51.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Kings

44.0
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 44.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Kings has a value of 44.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (44.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (53.4).
Prior Value
(53.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Kings

0.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 0.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Kings has a value of 0.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (0.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Kings

8.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 8.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Kings has a value of 8.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (8.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Kings

1.7
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 1.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Kings has a value of 1.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.8).
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Kings

Current Value:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Kings

36.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 36.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (26.7%), Kings has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Kings has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (36.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Kings

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Kings

16.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0), Kings has a value of 16.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Kings has a value of 16.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

Value
Compared to:

Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services County: Kings

Current Value:

Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services County: Kings

1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (1.3%), Kings has a value of 1.7%.
CA Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Kings has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (1.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Liquor Store Density County: Kings

Current Value:

Liquor Store Density County: Kings

3.3
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 3.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 3.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0), Kings has a value of 3.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Kings has a value of 3.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (3.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3).
Prior Value
(3.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Amanda's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Amanda's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who completed Amanda's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who completed Amanda's House services County: Kings

3
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (3) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10).
Prior Value
(10)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Frasiuer's Home services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Frasiuer's Home services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who completed Frasiuer's Home services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who completed Frasiuer's Home services County: Kings

6
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6).
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Grace Home services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Grace Home services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who completed Grace Home services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who completed Grace Home services County: Kings

13
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (13) is less and worse than the previously measured value (16).
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Hannah's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Hannah's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who completed Hannah's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who completed Hannah's House services County: Kings

10
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10) is less and worse than the previously measured value (20).
Prior Value
(20)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Samuel's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who completed Samuel's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who completed Samuel's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who completed Samuel's House services County: Kings

44
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (44) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33).
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Amanda's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Amanda's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Amanda's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Amanda's House services County: Kings

7
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (14).
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Frasieur's Home services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Frasieur's Home services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Frasieur's Home services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Frasieur's Home services County: Kings

14
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Grace Home services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Grace Home services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Grace Home services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Grace Home services County: Kings

15
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (15) is less and worse than the previously measured value (19).
Prior Value
(19)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Hannah's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Hannah's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Hannah's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Hannah's House services County: Kings

41
People enrolled
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (41) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41).
Prior Value
(41)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Number of Champions clients who use Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOT) services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOT) services County: Kings

0
People
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Outpatient Drug Free (ODF) services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Outpatient Drug Free (ODF) services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Outpatient Drug Free (ODF) services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Outpatient Drug Free (ODF) services County: Kings

156
People
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (156) is greater and better than the previously measured value (147).
Prior Value
(147)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use PE services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use PE services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use PE services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use PE services County: Kings

219
People
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (219) is greater and better than the previously measured value (210).
Prior Value
(210)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Samuel's House services

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Number of Champions clients who use Samuel's House services

Value
Compared to:

Number of Champions clients who use Samuel's House services County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Champions clients who use Samuel's House services County: Kings

153
People
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (153) is greater and better than the previously measured value (94).
Prior Value
(94)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Kings

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Kings

2.6%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Kings

300.8
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 300.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 333.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 444.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (300.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (293.0).
Prior Value
(293.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Kings

Current Value:

Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Kings

6.6
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.3), Kings has a value of 6.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1).
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who are aware of Champions resources County: Kings

25.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (25.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Respondents who Have Used Drug and Alcohol Services in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Respondents who Have Used Drug and Alcohol Services in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Have Used Drug and Alcohol Services in the Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Have Used Drug and Alcohol Services in the Community County: Kings

12.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings

Current Value:

Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings

40.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 40.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
CA Counties
(2011-2012)
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1%), Kings has a value of 40.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(23.1% in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (40.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.